A- de 2015
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
✓Claimant Armando Tirado Rincon·Respondent Direccion De Transito Y Transporte De Bucaramanga
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Competencia a prevención
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Tercero Promiscuo Municipal de Barbosa (Santander) y el Juzgado Cuarto Penal Municipal con Funciones de Conocimiento de Bucaramanga, en torno al trámite de la acción de tutela de la referencia.
La Corte decide el asunto ordenando la remisión del expediente al Juzgado Tercero Promiscuo Municipal de Barbosa, para que de manera inmediata tramite y adopte la decisión de fondo a que haya lugar.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (6 points)
- PRIMERO. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto del 4 de mayo de 2015 proferido por el Juzgado
- Tercero. Promiscuo Municipal de Barbosa - Santander, dentro del expediente ICC-2199.
- SEGUNDO. REMITIR al Juzgado
- Tercero. Promiscuo Municipal de Barbosa - Santander el expediente ICC-2199, para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decision de fondo a que haya lugar, dentro de la accion de tutela formulada por el senor Armando Tirado Rincon contra la Direccion de Transito y Transporte de Bucaramanga.
- TERCERO. ORDENAR que, por Secretaria General, se comunique la decision adoptada en esta providencia a las partes y al Juzgado
- Cuarto. Penal Municipal con Funciones de Conocimiento de Bucaramanga.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.